Fish to Amphibians - 2 of 3

For your consideration...the following is an excerpt from a radio spot on KAPL radio, Jacksonville, Oregon, called " Akin For the Truth". To listen to the entire spot (a few minutes long), click the little microphone icon....Jack

Last time we were discussing the various supposed transitional forms, or missing links, that have been proposed by evolutionists to contribute to the evolution of fish into amphibians. Of course, though obvious and intuitive, it has been mentioned many times that true missing links, that show single, beneficial mutations and incomplete transitions, must have lived in order to transfer their incomplete, not-yet-useful traits, to their progeny, which could then combine with another similar mutation during some far future event, to eventually form a discernible, useful new trait. But such are missing in their millions. Until such fossils are found, evolutionists, whether unconsciously or purposely, redefine the term “missing link��?. To an evolutionist today, a missing link is one that, though all of its features are fully formed, has characteristics in common with the two it supposedly links. One website cites a whole list of fossils filling the “missing link��? between lobe-finned fish and tetrapods, most of them discovered just since 1987. Others have been found as recently as 2006. The Panderichthys, for example, is supposedly a fish which had very similar skull and fin bones to some amphibians, so, say they, they must have later evolved to become amphibians.