Primitive languages are generally more complex than their derivatives, whereas modern languages are increasingly generalized and less precise. This is the opposite of what would happen if language were the product of a positive development process.

To accept evolutionist theories about language development, we must accept that people of ancient cultures were unable to write anything for hundreds of thousands to millions of years! Let's look into the history of written of pictographic and cuneiform writing.

The ability to communicate with our own kind in abstract, symbolic speech is unique to man, and the evolutionist has never been able to bridge the tremendous gulf between this ability and the grunts and barks of animals.

Our DNA is full of directed, purposed information – a code that could not have come from the random chaos of evolution.

Our DNA code is more complex than a space shuttle, but it’s the information translation system connected to that code that is truly baffling.

The universe, including time itself, is governed by laws demonstrating a clear, coded message from a well-intentioned Encoder.

There is a common moral code throughout all ages and cultures, and the idea of an "encoder" does not escape the notice of all all fields of science and philosophy.

Let’s look at the giraffe and the integrated functions and systems that would have to mutate all at once in order to keep the animal alive.

Fruit flies are often used to study genetic mutations, but even with 400 mutations, a new species has never resulted.

As we took a closer look at irreducible complexity, we go over the 2 mechanisms that are believed to make evolution possible: natural selection and genetic mutations.