In 1996 a group of Scientists formed to investigate the reliability of popular methods of radiometric dating. This research group was called the Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (or RATE group).

In concluding our discussions regarding what we can learn from the fossil record, it has been necessary to enlist many of the claims that can not be factually supported by the fossil record.

We left off last time with the Coelacanth, dubbed before living Coelacanths were discovered in the 1930s as the dinofish, a cross between amphibians and fishes.

Recently we investigated the plausibility of the theory that invertebrates could transform into vertebrates, those into amphibians, then those into reptiles, and those into birds and mammals. 

Unbroken transitional fossil evidence must be found in order to support presumptions that millions of favorable mutations, occurring simultaneously and/or in perfect order, have conspired to produce our incredible variety of living things. 

In trying to link fishes and amphibians, we find no "fishibian" has ever been found. Every fish, living or fossil, is fully fish, and every amphibian fully amphibian. 

Many are taught that lungfish evolved into land creatures. Today we'll look at the supposed transition from fishes to amphibians.

NO immediate ancestors for any of the 32 orders of mammals have been found, even though evolutionists believe there is a genetic link between ancient reptile and mammals.

The evolutionist sees through the lens of materialism and gradualism to explain variation by the development of increased order.

Even though the transition from invertebrates from vertebrates is supposed to have taken 100 million years, not a single intermediate has ever been discovered. 

The theory of evolution states within its doctrine that vertebrates evolved from more primitive invertebrates after millions of years.