We have been looking at the testimony of fossils in general and today we'll look more at the the Archaeopteryx.

Let's talk now about the supposed transition from reptiles to birds, which creationists see no evidence for in fossils.

Evolutionists who also study paleontology or sedimentary geology sometimes put forth arguments against the world-wide flood spoken of in Scripture being the source of most of the fossils we find.

We continue today by introducing the testimony of the fossils as we take a closer look at the various types that have been found. 

Opposing statements are sometimes made from two different camps using the same data - such as when interpreting the data provided by fossils. 

What we all thought took thousands, or millions of years, we saw happen in days, weeks and months at Mt.St. Helens!

Today we'll talk about the kinds of bias often used by scientists today.

Today we'll talk about 3 more kinds of baloney: straw man, fake terms, and broad or shifting definitions.

Continuing from our last discussion, I would like to briefly describe another research experience: the study of the reliability of Scripture.

Today we'll look a few varieties of "baloney" we should learn to detect: selective use of evidence, inappropriate appeals to authority, and ad hominem.

The reliability of the New Testament documents is a crucial point to be able to verify, so I decided to tested it's authenticity by research.

If any of you are searching for a successful marriage between philosophy and theology, let me recommend a book that every Christian today should study: Mere Christianity, by CS Lewis.

Last time I began presenting some testimonies by experts and researchers in various fields, all of which demonstrate that, no matter from what perspective you come, the Scriptures shine.